JAYNE has always supported free speech and informed consent when it comes to human experimental trials. It is alarming, this film PLANDEMIC was wiped from the internet and censored on every big tech platform. JAYNE vetted the many experts, Doctors, Scientists in this film and now have become vindicated by the actual evidence-based data that we now have learned about the Covid-19 actual stats.
learn more: https://jayne.social/JAYNETV/351/are-you-getting-the-vax/
Since this film release, the censorship has only ramped up and medical tyranny continues to violate all informed consent laws regarding experimental vaccines. The motives are clear now. The industrial pharma complex now controls the narrative and seeks profits over health, while the public is censored from hearing the true risks of Covid-19, the mRNA experimental risks, adverse effects, and any expert counter-narrative is attacked and silenced.
America has radically changed this past year with censorship and where human rights are no longer protected. Our media and tech companies are more like Noth Korea and Communist China where all infomation is controlled and any critical review or question is censored and deplatformed.
JAYNE does not endorse any medical advice and encourages you to always talk to your medical provider or doctor and do your research.
THESE COVID-19 EXPERIMENTAL GENE THERAPIES ARE IN VIOLATION OF EVERY POINT OF THE NUREMBERG CODE.
THIS IS ALSO IN VIOLATION OF UNITED STATES INFORMED CONSENT LAWS FOR EXPERIMENTAL MEDICAL PROCEDURES. THE OVERT CENSORSHIP OF MEDICAL EVIDENCE AND ONGOING ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS FROM GLOBAL EXPERTS AND HUNDRED OF THOUSANDS OF HARMED ( And thousands of deaths) VIOLATES INFORMED CONSENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS.
NUREMBERG CODE
1.
The voluntary informed consent of the human subject is essential.
2.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary.
3.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9.
During the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10.
During the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
THE LAW UNDERSTANDS THAT VALID INFORMED CONSENT WHICH AS FOLLOWS:
Voluntariness refers to the subject's right to freely exercise his/her decision-making without being subjected to external pressure such as coercion, manipulation, or undue influence.
Disclosure requires the researcher to supply each prospective subject with the information necessary to make an autonomous decision and also to ensure that the subject adequately understands the information provided. This latter requirement implies that a written consent form be written in lay language suited for the comprehension skills of the subject population, as well as assessing the level of understanding through conversation (to be informed).
Capacity pertains to the ability of the subject to both understand the information provided and form a reasonable judgment based on the potential consequences of his/her decision.
#PLANDEMIC THE MOVIE
#COVID19 #CENSORSHIP #BIGPHARMA #AGENDA21 #THEGREATRESET #COVIDVACCINATION #WHO #WORLDECONMICFORUM 
